We’re trying to rewatch Invasion now that it’s concluded (or cancelled). First season is heavy going, lots of parallel plots that only slowly intertwine if at all, and not necessarily so much happening in every episode.

Next will be a For all mankind rewatch to be fully prepped for the upcoming season 5. Let’s see if we can time it so we can binge the new episodes without a week’s wait in between…

    • haverholm@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Right? I said it elsewhere, but given the show’s global traction it would make so much sense to produce another Short Treks season to tide us over into season 2.

      • Tmiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        SFA has a metacritic user score of 1.7 “overwhelming dislike”

        • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Honestly surprised that you would cite such a transparently manipulated crowd-sourced rating.

          Especially when the Rotten Tomatoes pro critic score is 88% — far above the ‘review bombed’ audience score.

          Also, it seems you’re unaware that the review bombing was so bad that it’s been having a ‘Streisand Effect’ raising the profile of the show.

          When a show or movie has a distribution has a stack of 1/10 “worst show ever” votes and a fairly flat distribution otherwise, it’s clearly not showing votes of people who have seen it.

          The IMDb profile is particularly revealing. The overall rating of the show is low 4.4, with lots of 1/10s, but the ratings of the actual episodes run from 4.7 to 7.0 with an average for the episodes over 6 — despite some continuing review bombing.

          Here’s the obviously review bombed distribution of votes for the show overall.

          Here’s the crowdsourced vote distribution for episode 10

          The brigading by review bombers who never watched the show but claim they “saw some reviews on YouTube and know all they need to” got so completely out of hand that the people who have done this have made the situation into a pop psychology meme. Psychology Today even wrote a feature article “The Trouble with Review Bombing” about it.

          I also note that haverholm has linked the Flix Patrol rankings that show that SFA drew much more audience on platforms other than Paramount+ — which suggests it’s doing its jog in attracting new audiences.

          • Tmiwi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            do you have proof of review bombing? your reasoning for it not being actual reviews seems thin at best. who do you think is doing it? and why?

            can I also ask why you put weight in IMDb but ignore metacritic? it’s just an aggregation site after all.

            rereading you comment it seems that you feel that reviews of the show don’t count unless those people also review each episode individually? I’m not sure why you think that though? most people aren’t going to continue watching a show they don’t like so why would they then continue to review each episode?

            edit: spelling and clarity

            • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That distribution of reviews tells the story.

              An honest distribution of views of people who had watched at least one entire episode would not rate with 1/10 = the worst show they had ever watched.

              Not to mention that there are many people posting in other places that “they don’t need see it to know it’s awful” and that they are “campaigning against it.”

              • Tmiwi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                why wouldn’t they? because you’ve decided they wouldn’t? and your other point is apocraphal and just strengthens the fact that lots of people don’t like it

          • Tmiwi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            where is the run down? I just see opinion?

            oh I see you mean the comment above, unfortunately there isn’t really much there apart from a certainty of review bombing without any proof. how does anyone know that these aren’t actual reviews? I know it’s hard sometimes when people don’t like the thing you like but no need for conspiracy theories without proof

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sample review:

          Looks like they let woke write the script and ruin another show. Klingons are so misrepresented it’s sickening I had to turn it off. Klingons are a strong and proud race but you have them be wusses. So wrong!

            • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              90% of bad reviews I’ve seen online have been from people who were saying it was shit before it first aired and then talking about not watching it