I’m kind of sick of being a dev. I hate AI with a passion.

I hate the hallucinations, I hate slop, I hate megacrops, I hate the environmental impacts, I hate the massive costs. I could go on but you get the picture.

At work I often times have to review vibe code slop from people who clock in 9 to 5 and don’t give a fuck (I respect that, I just wish your fucking code wasn’t slop)

I’m sick of it, I’m sick of hearing about AI tooling or new models or bro agentic actions bro based on your documentation bro.

I want to switch careers, so which career is not ruined by AI?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m an electrical engineer and I deal mostly with medical equipment. Not even this field is safe. People are going to die.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Architecture is the other one that worries me. I don’t like the idea of unknowingly walking around in a building that was designed by AI. I work with AI and it can’t even be trusted to write a blog post correctly, let alone design a building that’s safe. And I know if I’m thinking of that now, it means someone else has already thought of and attempted it at least 6 months ago.

  • rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I work in a datacenter. I rack servers, I look after the cooling system, the generators, the ups’s, etc. I won’t ever be replaced by AI. Without me there is no AI. And I barely interact with it. I play with toys all day.

    The environmental impacts still bother me. But IT has always been wasteful, even before AI. I hate recycling days when I see exactly how much plastics, styrofoam and metals are going to the dump.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Previously the equation was trying to get as much processing out of every kilowatt-hour, now the equation is trying to use as much energy as possible. The impact of AI eclipses IT loads from before by a massive margin, and because of the theory behind it will never, ever do any better than it is right now. The environmental impact should bother you because it’s massive and getting bigger.

      And you’re helping set it up and keep it going. I know what it’s like to run a datacenter, I did it for a decade and a half. I’m not going to say I’m making more money now, but I do sleep much better.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        My datacenter doesn’t host AI. Most of my servers process data coming from the square kilometer array in Australia. We’re looking for aliens

        Problem is, cost of living is so extremely high where I live and I don’t know what else I would do to make enough money to stay here. I’m really good at this job, and I don’t have very many other talents

        It could be a lot worse too. Our cooling system is a closed loop so we aren’t using fuck tons of water like newer datacenters. In the winter we can mostly get away with air cooling from outside air. And the power in my city is all from hydro dams

            • sploosh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              This person is likely in facilities, I doubt they are touching servers much after they’re racked. Maybe a crash cart is shit really hits the fan and ops can’t get in remotely.

              They went from directly being responsible for AI to having nothing to do with it. My question is not unreasonable.

              • rabber@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                People like me are required to keep this AI empire going. There doesn’t seem to be a huge pool of people who are both computer people and good at physical labour/using tools.

                I just meant that AI isn’t going to make me unemployed

                I do a lot of system administration too. It depends on the system and who owns it. I do a pretty wide variety of work which is why I love it

                We had facilities monkeys like you describe but after a reorg they gave those responsibilities to whichever sysadmins showed the most interest, which is how I got the job. I’d rather play with toys than stare at a screen all day so the jump was a no brainer to me

  • brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m a tax lawyer. I’m gonna be very busy fixing the messes people make using AI-assisted do-it-yourself tax planning lol. And by fixing I mean telling them to beg for penalties to be forgiven lol

  • Aerosol3215@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    “AI can’t replace you but an AI salesman can convince your boss to replace you will AI.”

  • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Prostitution.

    I am not saying it’s the ideal career choice for most people, however it isn’t something ruined by AI…
    And there are opportunities to progress into a madam or pimp. Plus you get a funky hat with a feather, I’m unsure how this process goes though (I would imagine there must be some sort of application process for the hat).

    • Soulcreator@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I actually think you are on to something here as I feel like there will always be people who desire to be with a “real human”.

      That said if they ever developed something like a holodeck in real life I can see it making a dent in the industry.

      Like morally I’m completely fine with prostitution, although in practice consent is hugely important for me, and you can never be truly certain if they are being coerced into the practice by a pimp/madam/other extenuating circumstance. With a computer consent really becomes a non issue, and thus a little more “morally okay”.

  • MBech@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    CAD specialist.

    It’s gonna be a while, but I don’t expect it to be completely safe.

    My backup is construction management which I am also very much qualified to do. I very much doubt that’s in any danger in the near future.

    If both of those get completely taken over by AI, I’ll revert to being a carpenter. Not ideal, but if that gets taken over by AI, we’re at the point where workers have become entirely obsolete, at which point either universal basic income is a thing, or it’s time for a violent uprising against our AI overlords.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      An interesting thing about CAD is that the field got decimated in the switch to computers. You can choose to either go up the technical chain to be a great detailer or progress in CAD management since Autodesk and Bentley only do so much

  • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Airline mechanic. AI is not going anywhere near us and if it does it will be trained on absolute garbage and be wrong 100% of the time.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Idk maybe I’m wrong, but this feels like more of a hiring issue than AI. You should still be hiring good engineers, and you shouldn’t incentivize them to go so fast that they have to vibe code everything. Let good engineers use AI if they want, and not use it if they don’t want to. If their code is bad, it’s their fault, not the tools they are using.

  • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Day training and rescue. You could probably get AI and a robot to teach Pavlovian conditioning in a controlled environment (screen shows symbol, dog gives appropriate response, machine dispenses treat), but behavior modification, leash training in different environments, manners, social conditioning around other dogs/people/animals? A substantial number of humans can’t even train their own dogs to sit, much less behave in public. That’s why I have a job.

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Engineer

    Rocket scientist

    Electrician

    Plumber

    Mechanic

    Structural engineer

    Surveyor

    Anyone with a professional job that requires a degree, or even the most basic level of technical knowledge know that an LLM cannot replace their job by “putting words in enough of an order to sound like a person” or “drawing a picture that looks like something”

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Devs tend to say To hell with it! and lead happy lives in agriculture.
    I know a couple.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      As for agriculture:
      Interstellar (movie) has a good example on how that could look like.
      But remove the single person/family with corps.

      TLDR: GPS controlled automated harvesting machines.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Barber

    Chef

    Event operations (we will always need competent people on the ground who can quickly make decisions when the inevitable moment plans go awry, this happens in every live event)

    Or I guess building the AI?

    I am with you. Do accounting and tried to use our AI, it’s ok at some stuff but only the stuff that our intern could do for less cost than we are paying to license the AI. Fucking hate how it’s stuffed into inappropriate jobs. I think that sort of program has a place, sort through enormous datasets and give us the interesting bits, can help with DNA science, it’s not useless, but it can’t even balance a bank account.