Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
getoffthedrugsdude@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

this technology suffers from high latency

lemmy.ml

message-square
62
fedilink
1.33K

this technology suffers from high latency

lemmy.ml

getoffthedrugsdude@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
62
fedilink

IPoAC

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 year ago

    Strap 20 sd card with 1TB capacity each. Send the pidgeon to a neighboring city, 2 hours flight time.

    Bandwidth: 2.78 GB/s (assuming no wild hawks in the area)

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.”

    • doubletandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      high speed low drag

      • doppelgangmember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not until I use my… dragnet

    • whereBeWaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When “packet loss” occurs:

      This little maneuver is gonna cost us 51 years

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are forgetting the time it takes to copy the data to and from these cards. Data may be transported, but it is not usable until you copy it. Copying 20 TiB is probaply going to take some time

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fastest SD card has ~300MB/s read speed and ~250MB/s write speed. Assuming you can write to those cards in parallel, that means you’ll need an additional one hour to write the data to the SD cards and another one hour to read them back. So 4 hours in total which halves the data rates to 1.39 GB/s.

        That’s assuming the card can actually sustain ~250MB/s write speed during the full 1TB copy. It probably can if the card is freshly formatted but I haven’t actually tested it myself.

        • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s still very fast

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        you have the same problem with downloads though. In the end any download rate exceeding your disc write speed doesnt get you there faster.

        ofc. you can write as you download, which makes things faster.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      MicroSD cards are better, here. They’re 250mg; a pigeon can transport 75g. That’s 300 microSD cards, ignoring the weight of the SD card enclosure.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a terrible ping 😂

    • mineapple@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We had a TV report about a photographer who actually transfered big files with via horse because the transfer over the internet was slower than a calm ride. (Germany - 2021) link for Germans

  • Senseless@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When Baldur’s Gate 3 came out our group of friends wanted to start a game together. Since one of our friends, living about a kilometer away, has shitty internet it was faster for me to download the game myself, copy it to a USB stick, have it driven over by another friend, copy it onto the friends PC and verify file integrity than downloading it.

    German internet in a nutshell.

    So yeah, IPoAC would’ve it’s purpose.

    • fl42v@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      quote-never-underestimate-the-bandwidth-of-a-station-wagon-full-of-tapes-hurtling-down-the-andrew-s-tanenbaum-80-15-90-3647818434

      • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For render the first picture of a black hole a couple of uear ago, the data transfer was done through hdds transported by a plane, than a data transfer through Internet, because the former was so much faster.

        https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/289423-it-took-half-a-ton-of-hard-drives-to-store-eht-black-hole-image-data

      • iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are joking. But https://aws.amazon.com/snowmobile/ is real.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a real quote, from the 80s, published in a networking textbook.

          It’s amusing, but it’s always been a serious and occasionally practical observation.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Relevant XKCD.

      • d3m0nr4v3r@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      German internet in a nutshell.

      At least you got better healthcare.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      IPoAC is a joke about printing actual IP packets, sending them by pigeon, then scanning them.

      You do the whole usual TCP ACK/SYN thing, but with pigeons.

      It’s not the same as ‘sneakernet, but strapping microsd cards to a pigeon’. It’s way, way sillier.

      • Senseless@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know, explaining jokes doesn’t make them funnier.

        • Saigonauticon@voltage.vn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It makes them funnier the next time I hear them, in a new context though :)

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet he had ADSL

      • Senseless@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        50 MBit/s VDSL.

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it a German reaction to think: Hey, 50MBit is not that bad?

          • Zunon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I still remember when 150KiB/s was what we had as a child. It was very usable for the small amounts of data we needed back then.

        • Zunon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seeing it written as MBit/s feels so wrong to me, I read it as MB/s at first then I realized it’s Mb/s.

    • stingpie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m assuming English isn’t your first language, but “IPoAC would’ve it’s purpose” is grammatically awkward. “Would’ve” doesn’t really work for possession. Instead you can use “would have,” but people would typically say “IPoAC has it’s purpose”

      • Senseless@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the clarification. You’re right, English isn’t my first language.

        I’m a bit confused by your sentence:

        ““Would’ve” me doesn’t really work fur possession. Instead you can use “would have””

        That’s the same thing, isn’t it? My idea with using “would’ve” was that IPoAC would have it’s purpose, if it was a thing. I’m missing the descriptive word in either language right now.

        • stingpie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The word “have” is used in two different ways. One way is to own or hold something, so if I’m holding a pencil, I have it. But another way is as a way so signal different tenses (as in grammatical tense) so you can say “I shouldn’t have done it” or “they have tried it before.” The contraction “'ve” is only used for tense, but not to own something. So, the phrase “they’ve it” is grammatically incorrect.

  • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    But also super high throughput.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    The protocol is highly susceptible to DOS attacks by means of BB guns, slingshots or, for more sophisticated hackers, trained hawks.

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Unintentional encapsulation in hawks has been known to occur, with decapsulation being messy and the packets mangled.”

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      more sophisticated hawkers, if you will

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or more sophisticated hawks

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some guys actually managed to do a ping using this standard. I saw pictures and all.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And apparently it was better than the local internet provider

  • oNevia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “an example of packet loss” 🤣

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, we also saw the same post you did.

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh, the good old RFCs dated April, 1st. This one is number 1149 ( A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers), and got later updated in RFC 2549 (IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service).

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please note that IPoAC may suffer fatal device failure when delivering HTTP 418 error codes due to packet overheating.

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Old news, it’s been superseded by RFC6214.

    • Perroboc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “ There is evidence that some carriers have a propensity to eat other carriers and then carry the eaten payloads.”

      This is gold

  • TheFriendlyArtificer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    So Alfred Hitchcock predicted DDOS attacks decades before they were a thing?

    • UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I…

  • EtzBetz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    You need to set a pretty damn high timeout time for this to work.

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That said, the bandwidth of strapping microSD cards to carrier pigeons is actually pretty high.

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can a pigeon deliver my data faster than the Internet?

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine playing a shooter over a network using this protocol.

    • chetradley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      FPS by mail

      • nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Of course there is an xkcd (or rather what if on it)

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only torrent over IPoAC.

  • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Routing information protocol, little pigeon, routing information protocol.

Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml

programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 121 users / day
  • 533 users / week
  • 1.64K users / month
  • 10.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 35.6K subscribers
  • 1.6K Posts
  • 28.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • cat_programmer@lemmy.ml
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org