mudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down15
arrow-up1410arrow-down1imageI wasted all my generational luck for thisfiles.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38·1 month agoIf this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
minus-squareNot_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoWithout chicanery? Yes Without luck? No
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·edit-230 days agoI think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoI’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
minus-squareCookieOfFortune@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoAgreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.
If this is reproducible without chicanery, I’m terrified
Without chicanery? Yes
Without luck? No
I think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It’s orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence
I’d put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that’s so lucky it functionally should never happen.
Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation.
For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random.