• Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The game is really quite fun, this is one of the first Battlefield launches to be devoid of any major technical issues or controversies

    • hoppolito@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      When you say ‘one of the first Battlefield launches’ do you exclusively mean the new-strand of games?

      Cause I can’t really remember that much controversy around Battlefield 1942, Vietnam, 2142, Battlefield 2 or even 3.

      • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bf3 definitely had a buggy launch but was fixed decently quick if I recall correctly? Faster than bf4 was

        • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Bf4 was horrible but they eventually made a good game out of it and the basis was wayyyyy better than bf6.

          All the people who say bf6 is a good bf propably didnt play the older games. Maps are to small vehicles are bad the graphics design decisions are dumb (the modern you are outside and cant look into a house because it is a black void and if you are inside you can look outside bacause everything is to bright).

          I had so many crashes and couldnt play a ehole round…

          The game feels like if you told a cod developer to make a game that is a little like a battlefield.