maybe if you did yours you’d understand that “and” means both conditions need to be fulfilled for a statement to be true. so how is that child considered a property of anyone in this situation?
the definition part of the definition is the paragraph next to “1.” the bullet points below it are examples of how it applies. you provided that definition, are you telling me that on top of not understanding the meaning of “and” you also failed to understand the formatting itself?
i’m really not enraged, not even close to that. i’m calmly bewildered by your far-reaching thought process
it’s you who picked a hypertechnicality (“property of their parents” who btw. aren’t the ones making the kid do work here? it’s the school doing that, in case you forgot) to be mad about
Removed by mod
maybe if you did yours you’d understand that “and” means both conditions need to be fulfilled for a statement to be true. so how is that child considered a property of anyone in this situation?
Removed by mod
the definition part of the definition is the paragraph next to “1.” the bullet points below it are examples of how it applies. you provided that definition, are you telling me that on top of not understanding the meaning of “and” you also failed to understand the formatting itself?
Removed by mod
i’m really not enraged, not even close to that. i’m calmly bewildered by your far-reaching thought process
it’s you who picked a hypertechnicality (“property of their parents” who btw. aren’t the ones making the kid do work here? it’s the school doing that, in case you forgot) to be mad about
Removed by mod
sigh