• tane69@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Kinda crazy it took so much debate to admit what anyone with a conscience can see clearly

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree with you in principle, but I’m actually glad Wikipedia took their time on this. Makes them seem more credible and trustworthy. Especially when people still accuse them of bias all the time.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wikipedia is a free for all with the last say from a moderator who may or may not be biased. Most of them from are from the west want to shape their own version of history while staying under the radar using biased sources.

      This was a case where they couldn’t just sway away from the thousands of videos, news, and reports by independent international organizations. If all the news networks and social media were from the west, they would have very much swept it under the rug.

      They’re only speaking out now because their hypocrisy is now in the open.