Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down15
arrow-up160arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoSo conventional warfare?
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoYour premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.
So conventional warfare?
Your premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.