And what is the evidence for it being a Chinese spying platform? Is it owned by a Chinese company? Is there any hard evidence? Why is it so controversial?

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Except FB and Twitter sell their data to the highest bidder. If China wanted American’s data, they can just buy it.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good point. Seems like another issue of concern. As usual, the issue seems to be data privacy laws overall.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It is, but the relevance to the discussion is that China getting american’s data isn’t the reason for the ban. Nor is China influencing Americans because they tend to derank politically spicy videos. If China was controlling the algo to make the US look bad, videos tagged BLM wouldn’t have been deranked.

        Tiktok also wouldn’t have hired a bunch of state department spooks if they weren’t intending to keep amplifying US narratives.

        • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          It depends on the manner in which said “politically spicy videos” are being censored. If it’s being done in a manner that promotes Chinese narratives while demoting American narratives, that’s an entirely legitimate concern for the U.S. and I don’t really see why not demoting BLM videos is not in the CCP’s interest; videos that make America seem racist seems entirely in the interest of an Anti-American country.

          I also don’t see why hiring former American intelligence operatives demonstrates a pro-American stance, as their motivations for doing so could be to learn about American intelligence-gathering methods while promoting Chinese interests.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If it’s being done in a manner that promotes Chinese narratives while demoting American narratives

            Spicy in this case means protests, police misbehavior, stuff the US wouldn’t want amplified. The big waves of censorship came in 2020 and 2022. You can search news articles from the time with lots of people wondering why they’re no longer getting that content in their FYPs and content creators getting <1/10th of the views. FB and reddit do the same thing.

            I don’t really see why not demoting BLM videos is not in the CCP’s interest; videos that make America seem racist seems entirely in the interest of an Anti-American country.

            Amplifying the videos that show America’s response to antiracist movements would make America look like the racist country it is. Demoting them conceals that.

            I also don’t see why hiring former American intelligence operatives demonstrates a pro-American stance, as their motivations for doing so could be to learn about American intelligence-gathering methods while promoting Chinese interests.

            CIA agents living in America who disseminate intelligence-gathering methods while promoting Chinese interests get charged with treason.

            They were hired to help identify and amplify US state department narratives, same reason CNN and Fox hires them.

            • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Amplifying the videos that show America’s response to antiracist movements would make America look like the racist country it is. Demoting them conceals that.

              No, that doesn’t make sense. Amplifying shows of division in a country promotes the view that said country is flawed and weak, in this case along racial lines. China has plenty to gain by showing that.

              And America is no less racist than China, btw. I would argue far less so.

              They were hired to help identify and amplify US state department narratives, same reason CNN and Fox hires them.

              That seems entirely speculative. There are plenty of other reasons to hire them. Can you provide evidence for your claim?

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Amplifying shows of division in a country promotes the view that said country is flawed and weak, in this case along racial lines. China has plenty to gain by showing that.

                Exactly! So demoting those videos suggests that China is not using the algorithm to promote anti-american views.

                That seems entirely speculative. There are plenty of other reasons to hire them. Can you provide evidence for your claim?

                No, CIA agents don’t go around saying they’re working for media companies to disseminate propaganda, and media companies don’t broadcast that they take extra care to make sure their coverage lines up with the state department’s narratives.

                • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Exactly! So demoting those videos suggests that China is not using the algorithm to promote anti-american views.

                  ??? You’re trying to have it both ways with this. I’m out.

                  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    23 hours ago

                    No I’m not, you’ve been misunderstanding me from the start.

                    Tiktok does not amplify views that make the US look bad, it demotes them. That demonstrates that china is not using tiktok to influence Americans because they would want the opposite.

                    Instead they do exactly what any media subservient to the state department does.