It’s really great for someone who doesn’t know how to use debain itself and their community are super friendly so do you think it’s worth it’s legacy

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would that make it a pass? Did you read the whole thing? It includes SystemD by default and an option to easily switch to it.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I admittedly missed the last part way down at the bottom about systemd-sysv. I suppose that’s more acceptable… but still you’re going to be using a minority distro with a minority configuration … that rarely ends well.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All it does is symlink init to systemd. That is very unlikely to ever cause a problem. It will function the same as using SystemD by default. This distro has been around and working well for quite a long time now.

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            … and I’m sure it still has a fraction of the users of more mainstream distros and a fraction of those people actually using the systemd init system.

            • priapus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A fraction, but still not an insignificant amount. Either way, all it does it change /sbin/init to be a symlink to systemd. That’s the same exact thing distros using systemd by default do.

    • kraniax@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      how can someone be pro systemd lol. it’s been one of the cancers’ of the Linux desktop for years

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really hasn’t. Some people freaked out about it for weak reasons, similar to people freaking out about Wayland.

        It’s made working across distros so much nicer. The fundamental service management, logging, etc is all just a bunch of common tools and patterns.

        Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Majaro, etc didn’t switch to it because “it’s one of the cancer’s of the Linux desktop for years.”

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m drawing a blank on it… makes me think of MK Linux, AKA MicroKernel Linux from the 90s, but I’m pretty sure they’re not related if this is Debian-based.

    How can someone not know how to use Debian though? It was a pain when 1.0 was released, but these days installs just as easily as Mint….

  • librechad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian is super easy to use, plus we have AI now at our fingertips which makes it even easier.

    • Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Will its really good but isn’t Linux mint de and especially MX is better than Debain for A few tools but i agree that they’re better than official Ubuntu and easier than vanilla arch

  • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    for someone who doesn’t know how to use debain itself

    Huh? What special knowledge does using Debian require and what does MX do differently?