This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.

And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
    71·
    22 days ago

    Then he should of already faced the death penalty for the thousands (millions?) of deaths he caused.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.worldEnglish
      27·
      22 days ago

      You can argue the morality of the situation all you like, but that circumstance doesn’t constitute murder. People in the military can kill thousands without legally being a murderer

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        51·
        22 days ago

        The laws are designed to allow murdering the poor. That doesn’t make it “not murder”. When you deny live-saving treatment out of profit considerations, that is both premeditated and killing out of greed. There’s two murder criteria right there.

        If the laws are designed for the elite, it is very stupid to argue morality based on what’s “lawful” and what is illegal.