Keep dreaming, and even if Apple magically licensed out I’m not sure it would be worthwhile.

Intel & AMD have been incredible at maintaining, supporting mainline Linux and keeping old hardware supported.

Apple on the other hand ends support at 7years maximum, no Linux support.

Qualcomm ends support at 5y with support being the bear minimum for Linux.

Why this obsession with ARM?

Do you even what to be able to game on the thing? AMD cpus have come a long way with battery life. And Linux amd64 support is at this point at 20years, arm is at 5y if you’re lucky, usually 2-0y.

Lunduke + DHH

You can’t name a more hateful duo in the Linux YouTuber sene.

Sucks to be you

deleted by creator

Great album faces

Heroic Games Launcher FTW

Pop

“Left behind” insinuates inaction, the USA has been very active at driving away from electrification.

Now imagine if website were built to use the space in between the center wrapper with on the left a highly configurable filter or navigation list and on the right a gallery of related games, so that the main content could be used only for the important stuff.

Imagine not needing a 4K display just to keep ui design’s padding to a reasonable level

So?, I’d still like the less important stuff to be open on the side rather than hidden in a menu button that drops over the content. Think detailed info, filters, related.

Take a look at a newspaper, do you see bars of nothing on the left and right of the page? No.

Steams audience is a prime example where catering to more extreme screen sizes actually makes sense.

The technology arrived a decade ago to do this.

Snow Leopard is where ui peaked

I thought this picture was a render, a joke

“The oligarchs own the economy, they own the media, they own the political process. That’s the reality.” – Senator Bernie Sanders

Worse, it looks like Pop_OS!

How is it a better source? It uses language that tricks most vegans in thinking 2/3s of pollution is from eating meat! I remember watching vegan documentaries and getting that same statistic.

The myworldindata shows the values in “tonnes ofcarbon dioxide-equivalents per person per year” apples to oranges.

That’s fair the numbers indeed don’t add up, my graphic uses CO2 while nature.com uses: “estimating greenhouse gas (GHG; CO2, CH4, N2O, fluorinated gases) emissions” comparing apples to oranges.

But even in the nature.com study my original stance still stands, eating meat does not contribute to 2/3 of emissions. Yes it is an important factor but so is insulation & transportation.

0.34 * 0.71 ≠ 0.66

In 2015, food-system emissions amounted to 18 Gt CO2 equivalent per year globally, representing 34% of total GHG emissions. The largest contribution came from agriculture and land use/land-use change activities (71%), with the remaining were from supply chain activities: retail, transport, consumption, fuel production, waste management, industrial processes and packaging.

Food = total GHG emissions * 0.34

Agriculture = Food * 0.71

(supply chain activities: retail, transport, consumption, fuel production, waste management, industrial processes and packaging) = Food * 0.29

Learn to read

While yes, consuming less meat and especially cow (dairy, beef) is good for you and the environment, your 2/3 statistic falls a part with actual data

https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector

Get your statistics right or don’t say them at all.